<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Power corrupts in proportion to its disequilibria</title>
	<atom:link href="http://decentralist.wordpress.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://decentralist.wordpress.com</link>
	<description>Decentralism</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 25 Apr 2013 14:04:42 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Irony of Federalists vs. Anti-Federalists by julie r butler</title>
		<link>http://decentralist.wordpress.com/2012/05/13/the-irony-of-federalists-vs-anti-federalists/#comment-1515</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[julie r butler]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Apr 2013 14:04:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://decentralist.wordpress.com/?p=101#comment-1515</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The meaning of &quot;federalism&quot; has changed since its use by the authors of the &quot;Federalist Papers.&quot; They argued to have the U.S. Constitution, which established a central government with executive, legislative, and judicial branches and it gave the central government the power to collect taxes. The Constitution was drafted after the Articles of Confederation had failed that new nation because there was no central government at all, which meant that the states could not make agreements with foreign governments as a single unit, and the soldiers of the Continental Army who had fought and won the Revolutionary War couldn&#039;t even be paid - during the 1783 Pennsylvania Mutiny, 500 unpaid soldiers stormed the Continental Congress, and if you want some irony, they requested the Pen. Militia to protect them from their own troops, but they refused. The Federalists of that time recognized how the states had turned against each other as the postwar depression deepened, and that a strong central government was necessary to prevent the lack of unity amongst the not-so-united states from destroying the fledgling nation.

The &quot;Federalists&quot; of today, such as the activist judges and libertarians who are members of the &quot;Federalist Society,&quot; want to limit the central government.

The real irony in this is that today&#039;s Federalists don&#039;t seem to understand that a federalist state is not the same thing as a unitary state, where subnational units only have the rights and powers that are granted them by the national government. In the United States, which is a federalist system, the states have powers and rights that cannot be unilaterally changed or infringed upon by the central government. (There are, of course, several areas where the power of the central government over the states is open to interpretation of the Constitution.) 

Today&#039;s Federalists, like yesterday&#039;s &quot;Anti-Federalists&quot; and the Confederates of the Civil War, want the states to have more independence than the U.S. Constitution grants them. If they want to change the power structure, they will have to do what the original Federalists did and either make a new constitution or amend the one  that exists.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The meaning of &#8220;federalism&#8221; has changed since its use by the authors of the &#8220;Federalist Papers.&#8221; They argued to have the U.S. Constitution, which established a central government with executive, legislative, and judicial branches and it gave the central government the power to collect taxes. The Constitution was drafted after the Articles of Confederation had failed that new nation because there was no central government at all, which meant that the states could not make agreements with foreign governments as a single unit, and the soldiers of the Continental Army who had fought and won the Revolutionary War couldn&#8217;t even be paid &#8211; during the 1783 Pennsylvania Mutiny, 500 unpaid soldiers stormed the Continental Congress, and if you want some irony, they requested the Pen. Militia to protect them from their own troops, but they refused. The Federalists of that time recognized how the states had turned against each other as the postwar depression deepened, and that a strong central government was necessary to prevent the lack of unity amongst the not-so-united states from destroying the fledgling nation.</p>
<p>The &#8220;Federalists&#8221; of today, such as the activist judges and libertarians who are members of the &#8220;Federalist Society,&#8221; want to limit the central government.</p>
<p>The real irony in this is that today&#8217;s Federalists don&#8217;t seem to understand that a federalist state is not the same thing as a unitary state, where subnational units only have the rights and powers that are granted them by the national government. In the United States, which is a federalist system, the states have powers and rights that cannot be unilaterally changed or infringed upon by the central government. (There are, of course, several areas where the power of the central government over the states is open to interpretation of the Constitution.) </p>
<p>Today&#8217;s Federalists, like yesterday&#8217;s &#8220;Anti-Federalists&#8221; and the Confederates of the Civil War, want the states to have more independence than the U.S. Constitution grants them. If they want to change the power structure, they will have to do what the original Federalists did and either make a new constitution or amend the one  that exists.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on LibreOffice vs. OpenOffice, Not Always Simple by Nick</title>
		<link>http://decentralist.wordpress.com/2012/10/01/libreoffice-vs-openoffice-not-always-simple/#comment-1507</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Nick]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Apr 2013 16:13:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://decentralist.wordpress.com/?p=161#comment-1507</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Try WPS office by Kingsoft. It is free and pretty much a clone of Microsoft Office.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Try WPS office by Kingsoft. It is free and pretty much a clone of Microsoft Office.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on LibreOffice vs. OpenOffice, Not Always Simple by RobK</title>
		<link>http://decentralist.wordpress.com/2012/10/01/libreoffice-vs-openoffice-not-always-simple/#comment-1500</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[RobK]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Mar 2013 08:11:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://decentralist.wordpress.com/?p=161#comment-1500</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Is the Google Doc products any better? Or have you even tried that one?
Thanks.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is the Google Doc products any better? Or have you even tried that one?<br />
Thanks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on LibreOffice vs. OpenOffice, Not Always Simple by RobK</title>
		<link>http://decentralist.wordpress.com/2012/10/01/libreoffice-vs-openoffice-not-always-simple/#comment-1499</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[RobK]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Mar 2013 08:08:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://decentralist.wordpress.com/?p=161#comment-1499</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In this case, its a matter of what works, and what products you can use thats SAFE, and secure, and will not slow you down, or make you call IT to fix. If AOO works there at work, use it. It you want to play with LO on your own time where its not as important if you loose something, then thats cool. I feel the same way about other documents and situations too.
Thanks, Rob]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In this case, its a matter of what works, and what products you can use thats SAFE, and secure, and will not slow you down, or make you call IT to fix. If AOO works there at work, use it. It you want to play with LO on your own time where its not as important if you loose something, then thats cool. I feel the same way about other documents and situations too.<br />
Thanks, Rob</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on LibreOffice vs. OpenOffice, Not Always Simple by R.Ommelaar</title>
		<link>http://decentralist.wordpress.com/2012/10/01/libreoffice-vs-openoffice-not-always-simple/#comment-1491</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[R.Ommelaar]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Feb 2013 17:53:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://decentralist.wordpress.com/?p=161#comment-1491</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Open Office versus Libre Office: every time I &#039;m curious about the performance of Libre Office and reinstall it again... to try if it can handle my &gt; 80 pages documents. Where my AOO can handle the documents quite easily (barely no extra cache memory, limited extra processor time) the lon g documents are literally shocking. This discomfort makes me deinstall Libre Office every time. I tested again the release 4.0 of LO, again very slow performance in larger documents. Despite the extra features in LO, the more vivid community I will stay on AOO until the basic features like speed, memory-load are solved.  I feel sorry, but consider this as &#039;&#039;feed-back&#039;&#039;,. 

WGP]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Open Office versus Libre Office: every time I &#8216;m curious about the performance of Libre Office and reinstall it again&#8230; to try if it can handle my &gt; 80 pages documents. Where my AOO can handle the documents quite easily (barely no extra cache memory, limited extra processor time) the lon g documents are literally shocking. This discomfort makes me deinstall Libre Office every time. I tested again the release 4.0 of LO, again very slow performance in larger documents. Despite the extra features in LO, the more vivid community I will stay on AOO until the basic features like speed, memory-load are solved.  I feel sorry, but consider this as &#8221;feed-back&#8221;,. </p>
<p>WGP</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on LibreOffice vs. OpenOffice, Not Always Simple by JOE</title>
		<link>http://decentralist.wordpress.com/2012/10/01/libreoffice-vs-openoffice-not-always-simple/#comment-1489</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[JOE]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Feb 2013 07:22:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://decentralist.wordpress.com/?p=161#comment-1489</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Regardless to any bugs that has been encountered over the past i think Libre Office is doing a good job on updating there software.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Regardless to any bugs that has been encountered over the past i think Libre Office is doing a good job on updating there software.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on LibreOffice vs. OpenOffice, Not Always Simple by Aveesh</title>
		<link>http://decentralist.wordpress.com/2012/10/01/libreoffice-vs-openoffice-not-always-simple/#comment-1488</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Aveesh]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Feb 2013 04:08:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://decentralist.wordpress.com/?p=161#comment-1488</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Cannot shift objects off sheet is a bug that was introduced in Excel 2003 when in VBA, notes were changed to comment shape objects. To fix this, display comments/notes (not just the red but with the whole comment - advanced view setting), hit F5 (goto), click [Special] button, select [objects] option button, click OK to select. All comments are then &quot;selected&quot;, right click on any selected one and properties (or Ctrl F1 I think) and change property to [Move and Size] with cells

Hiding columns will not only NOT give error but be faster by orders of magnitude....]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cannot shift objects off sheet is a bug that was introduced in Excel 2003 when in VBA, notes were changed to comment shape objects. To fix this, display comments/notes (not just the red but with the whole comment &#8211; advanced view setting), hit F5 (goto), click [Special] button, select [objects] option button, click OK to select. All comments are then &#8220;selected&#8221;, right click on any selected one and properties (or Ctrl F1 I think) and change property to [Move and Size] with cells</p>
<p>Hiding columns will not only NOT give error but be faster by orders of magnitude&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on LibreOffice vs. OpenOffice Part 2: All Bugs Are Shallow When Blogged to a Linux News Feed by Richie</title>
		<link>http://decentralist.wordpress.com/2012/10/10/libreoffice-vs-openoffice-part-2-all-bugs-are-shallow-when-blogged-to-a-linux-news-feed/#comment-1483</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Richie]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Feb 2013 14:07:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://decentralist.wordpress.com/?p=170#comment-1483</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I jumped into Libre Office soon after Oracle showed its colors, and continued using it until... on an upgrade, they added the heading widget thingy -- which I found extremely annoying,  and removed the page borders.  Among other things, I use it for book  layout:s, and  that was disorientating.  I installed Apache Open Office and have been entirely satisfied. I wish AOO was an installation option:  I set up my parents with a Linux machine (finally!), and wanted the GUI to be as Windows-like as possible.  They had been using OO, so for name recognition purposes, and reliability,  I removed Libre Office from the Mint-Mate installation and installed AOO. So far the only feature that&#039;s been missed is the ability to import old Works files. 

As an aside,  I have found Gnumeric to be more efficient than Excel and both Open Offices. One spreadsheet in particular with thousands of calculations which gave Excel (XP version) indigestion, and slowed OO to a snail&#039;s pace, works flawlessly in Gnumeric -- which also saves it in a fraction of the original size. Although it lacks the formatting candy and macros -- but in just doing basic spreadsheet work, it&#039;s in another league (that&#039;s my experience, anyway).]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I jumped into Libre Office soon after Oracle showed its colors, and continued using it until&#8230; on an upgrade, they added the heading widget thingy &#8212; which I found extremely annoying,  and removed the page borders.  Among other things, I use it for book  layout:s, and  that was disorientating.  I installed Apache Open Office and have been entirely satisfied. I wish AOO was an installation option:  I set up my parents with a Linux machine (finally!), and wanted the GUI to be as Windows-like as possible.  They had been using OO, so for name recognition purposes, and reliability,  I removed Libre Office from the Mint-Mate installation and installed AOO. So far the only feature that&#8217;s been missed is the ability to import old Works files. </p>
<p>As an aside,  I have found Gnumeric to be more efficient than Excel and both Open Offices. One spreadsheet in particular with thousands of calculations which gave Excel (XP version) indigestion, and slowed OO to a snail&#8217;s pace, works flawlessly in Gnumeric &#8212; which also saves it in a fraction of the original size. Although it lacks the formatting candy and macros &#8212; but in just doing basic spreadsheet work, it&#8217;s in another league (that&#8217;s my experience, anyway).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on LibreOffice vs. OpenOffice Part 2: All Bugs Are Shallow When Blogged to a Linux News Feed by John</title>
		<link>http://decentralist.wordpress.com/2012/10/10/libreoffice-vs-openoffice-part-2-all-bugs-are-shallow-when-blogged-to-a-linux-news-feed/#comment-1481</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[John]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Feb 2013 22:12:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://decentralist.wordpress.com/?p=170#comment-1481</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Have you tried the Bug Submission Assistant for Libreoffice:
https://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/bug/
Also available via &#039;feedback&#039; on the help menu.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Have you tried the Bug Submission Assistant for Libreoffice:<br />
<a href="https://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/bug/" rel="nofollow">https://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/bug/</a><br />
Also available via &#8216;feedback&#8217; on the help menu.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on LibreOffice vs. OpenOffice, Not Always Simple by Hikari</title>
		<link>http://decentralist.wordpress.com/2012/10/01/libreoffice-vs-openoffice-not-always-simple/#comment-1474</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Hikari]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Jan 2013 05:36:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://decentralist.wordpress.com/?p=161#comment-1474</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[About poster, you also should report and maybe even try to fix the bug. Wait years to get a free fix for a bug in a free software, that you use for so long and needed the fix all this time...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>About poster, you also should report and maybe even try to fix the bug. Wait years to get a free fix for a bug in a free software, that you use for so long and needed the fix all this time&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
